Today I’m excited to share that we have another guest post by the multi-talented Gry Tina Tinde. (Many of you will recall Tina’s first guest post, the wild and wacky adventures of A Ski Instructor to Die For.)
Tina has spent a lifetime working around the globe for the betterment of the human condition. With many years’ experience working with the UN on international development, refugee affairs, repatriation, human rights, electoral reform, women’s livelihood, gender issues and the like, she’s also been a think tank researcher and an advisor to both the Norwegian Ministry of Defense and the Council of Baltic Sea States. Currently she serves as Diversity Advisor at the Inter-American Development Bank in Washington, DC.
Tina has been working on a novel set in a UN mission in Cambodia, but every now and then she writes short stories from life experiences. Since she doesn’t have a blog, she has a standing invitation to share her work here with us.
The following is a personal piece on the serious side. Tina had been asked to write a piece for a website that encourages young women not to rush into marriage; when she submitted this piece, they apologetically said no thank you because, of all things, it was a little too positive on marriage!
Well, their loss is our gain.
Oh, and for the record, Tina HAS met Brad and Angelina in the course of the latter’s work for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. She found them highly engaged and engaging, and is a big fan onscreen and off.
[Per the usual disclaimer, the views below are Tina's alone, and not necessarily reflective of her employer.]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ON MARRIAGE I GO WITH BRAD PITT
by Gry Tina Tinde
I’m a single woman and lately I’ve been going to marriage seminars.
Many are held near my office in Washington, DC. I excitedly find a seat up front, take copious notes and often grab a microphone to ask questions or cheer on the presenters.
I boldly state that marriage is really important. As I am not a native English speaker and feel daunted by crowds of strangers, I stumble over words and fail to hide my corny Norwegian accent.
Sometimes I shed a tear or two due to heart-rending testimonials by speakers or members of the audience. During the breaks shy glances and nods of recognition fly across the room. Participants from across the globe hug and slap each other supportively on the back. E-mail addresses and telephone numbers are exchanged. These meetings mean the world to me.
Family and friends might be surprised by my sudden passion for marriage, as they know tying the knot has hardly been on the top of my priority list.
Except twice, when I proposed to the fathers of my two children who were born six years apart. The first dad happily agreed, but forgot that he was already married, and in a country that prohibits divorce (the Philippines). The second, whom I may have chosen for his Viking looks, gave it some thought and declined. Oh well.
Focusing on the wonder of becoming a mom and the daily toil, I felt quite comfortable being independent and defying social conventions. Marriage was, after all, an archaic institution that had kept women and not insignificant numbers of men in their place for centuries.
As I was 30 when I first gave birth, I had completed a master’s degree and had worked five years for the United Nations already. A lack of a marriage certificate was not going to stop me from holding my own beautiful babies in my arms. (I conveniently overlooked that they would one day become teenagers.)
Why then, this recent interest in marriage? A main reason is that I work as a diversity advisor in human resources in an international organization. It’s a dream job that involves attending seminars on same-sex marriage, where I admittedly tear up sometimes.
Marriage laws and practices around the world can make anyone cry, I think. I will not delve here into child and forced marriages, dowry, honor killings or widow burning, as I wish to focus on same-sex marriage in this piece. Often out of sync with gender equality and social justice, marriage laws or customs may prevent adults and children from leading happy and safe lives, and are also known to prevent international mobility (which is a human resources concern for international companies and organizations).
As I see it, a couple that wishes to get married should have the option to do so; all the while this type of formal contract exists and may bring advantages to those who sign.
At marriage seminars I learn about challenges faced by employees and employers,
which helps me support an inclusive work environment and propose policies that
are fair to everyone. As employers we know that people bring their whole self with them to work. By feeling respected for who we are, with all our differences, we have better chances of reaching our full potential as professionals. We also become more fulfilled as individuals.
But there are many groups of people who experience prejudice at work about who they are, regardless of how good their professional performance is. One issue that employers grapple with is discrimination in national legislations against lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender (LGBT) people.
Such discrimination, including regarding same-sex marriage, directly affects people’s personal and professional lives. A growing number of companies and organizations, including where I work, ensure the same partner, adoption, bereavement and other benefits to non-heterosexuals as to heterosexuals. Yet employees and employers continue to encounter national laws, insurance limitations and other practices that prevent full equality. (For further information, see Wikipedia overviews LGBT rights globally and of same-sex marriage legislation.)
Getting married and choosing one’s spouse is a human right, as stated in Article 16 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights that was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1948:
“(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution; (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses; (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.”
Marriage laws favor heterosexuals in all countries except ten, as of October 2011. Advantages to being married may include: a work permit in the foreign country where your spouse was just hired; inheritance, adoption and child custody rights; and the list goes on.
We can think what we want about the institution of marriage, but as long as it exists in a country’s laws, I believe it should apply to everyone.
One of the best arguments I heard in favor of same-sex marriage came from a lawyer who spoke at a panel discussion I attended at the Aspen Institute last year. According to him it is futile to challenge same-sex marriage in court. In order to have a legal case, one needs a plaintiff who presents how he or she has been or would be hurt. One cannot find evidence that passing same-sex marriage legislation would hurt or otherwise compromise anyone, he argued.
This is why I campaign for marriage. I am thrilled that Brad Pitt supports the cause. He maintains that he and Angelina Jolie will not get hitched until everyone can, including LGBT individuals.
Tina asks:
What are your views? Do you support Brad and Angie’s marriage strike?
You can follow @TinaTinde on Twitter
[Image credit: dieraecherin, MorgueFile]






















A wonderful piece, beautifully written. I couldn’t agree more with the sentiments expressed.
However, I have a feeling that, as with all incisive comments on this subject, Tina is preaching to the converted, insofar as those who do not agree do not bother to (do not want to) read such coherent arguments!
Thanks Deb. I’d like to think that, as with other ‘radical, sensitive’ issues in the past, getting the word out and writing about these topics does help to gently sway the silent majority. Over time, what seems scandalous becomes less so, and eventually tolerated, accepted, even expected.
I whole heartedly agree and believe that minds can only be opened by gentle persuasion not force. Most people oppose same sex marriage through fear and misconception, failing to appreciate the humanity behind two people building a life together, whatever their sexual orientation.
In the blindness of prejudice the notion of happy, healthy, fulfilled adults does not factor as a reason for tolerance. Things will change, are changing, however painfully and slowly, when people like Tina care enough to put forward clear coherent arguments like this. Bravo!
Beautifully put!
I also totally agree with the sentiments. I’m glad there are people like you (and Brad and Angelina of course) in positions of influence who are prepared to say ‘Same sex marriage, what’s the big deal?’ The more fundamental problem is that LGBT communities in many parts of the world have no rights at all and live in fear of their lives. Even in those countries where this isn’t so the main obstacle to same-sex marriage is established religion, many of which arrogantly consider marriage to be a holy institution ordained by God for one man, one woman/several women (delete according to creed) to be sanctified by them. I’ve no problem with people holding a personal faith but until we can truly separate church/mosque/temple/synagogue from state and get religion out of secular politics same sex marriage will never be a universal right. I live in hope that more we chip away at it, the better we will get.
I agree so much that sometimes I get caught off guard, forgetting that not everyone believes this, and I stand with a dropped jaw, staring in mute disbelief at someone who says something to the contrary! It just seems so obvious. How can we even think we can restrict two loving people from getting married? Weird.
What a great thought provoking piece. I salute you both for sharing this. While not actually anti marriage I’ve never really felt it was for me. But the sentiments expressed here,that all should have the opportunity to choose it is spot on, the key word being choose.
I agree Kym. One of the things I find most interesting about living in a different country (and traveling extensively) is seeing the different perspectives on ‘rights’ and ‘choices’. I’ve always appreciated the blessed of being born when/where I was (I don’t necessarily think I would have faired well as a serving wench or serf in another time/place), but as you get out and encounter other cultures, you start to realize that choices are different – and not always for the better. Vive la choice!
I went to Anne Frank’s house in Amsterdam a couple of years ago and they had this media piece playing in an auditorium (just near where you exited) on rights and choices. Really thought provoking as it pointed out these things are not cut and dried and in fact these freedoms can contradict. Have you seen it?
I’ve been to the Anne Frank house twice, and am a huge fan since it’s such a powerful story and the museum is done so well. I probably did see it but can’t recall it off the top of my head. Certainly rights, choices and freedoms can contradict, but I do believe we can strive for personal freedoms that don’t impinge on others’ rights.